Independent Research Confirms MindPrint Assessment Reliably Identifies Students Who Need Academic Support and Predicts Achievement Outcomes
MindPrint Learning, a K-12 intervention and acceleration solution now part of Otus, has announced the publication of a comprehensive validation study conducted by Johns Hopkins University's Center for Research and Reform in Education. The research confirms the reliability and predictive validity of the MindPrint assessment for identifying students’ cognitive strengths and needs.
The study, conducted across three diverse school districts in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Arkansas, examined data from 15,581 students in grades 4-12. It found that MindPrint assessment scores demonstrated strong internal consistency reliability and explained between 37% and 55% of variation in student achievement across math, reading, and science.
MindPrint assesses neurocognitive skills across the domains of complex reasoning, executive functions, memory, and speed. Originally developed at the University of Pennsylvania's Brain Behavior Lab, the one-hour assessment identifies students who may benefit from additional support through the Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) or Response to Intervention (RTI) process or from referral for comprehensive educational evaluation (gifted and special education).
The study was designed to meet Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Tier 4 evidence standards—the highest level of evidence possible for an assessment tool. According to the report, "The combination of this plan with the supportive results from the present psychometric validation study and MindPrint's logic model and foundational research is consistent with ESSA Tier 4 criteria, the highest rating available for an assessment."
Strong Reliability and Validity: The research team, led by Dr. Michael A. Cook and Dr. Steven M. Ross, found that MindPrint assessment scores showed acceptable-to-strong levels of internal consistency across all three districts, meeting rigorous psychometric standards for educational assessments.
Works Across Diverse Contexts: The three districts included in the study ranged from high-poverty urban schools to suburban settings, with student populations that were racially and ethnically diverse. Results were consistent across all three contexts, demonstrating the assessment's universal applicability.
Accurate Identification of Students with Special Needs: The study found statistically significant differences in MindPrint scores between students receiving special education services and those who were not, with 76% of comparisons showing significant differentiation. The study looked at students with a variety of diagnosed learning differences, including dyslexia, ADHD, and Autism, as well as gifted, supporting the use of MindPrint in identifying students for student support.
Predictive of Academic Success: Regression analyses revealed that MindPrint scores consistently predicted student achievement on standardized assessments, including NWEA MAP, Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA), and Arkansas Teaching, Learning & Assessment System (ATLAS). "MindPrint assessment scores were significantly positively associated with math, ELA, and science student achievement scores," the researchers noted. "The magnitudes and direction of these correlations were consistent across districts." These findings suggest MindPrint can provide valuable insights to help improve student performance on year-end summative assessments.
The full report, titled "Validation and Utility Study of MindPrint Learning's Universal Screener for Special Education," is available online.
The Center for Research and Reform in Education (CRRE) at Johns Hopkins University School of Education conducts rigorous research to improve educational outcomes for all students. CRRE has established itself as a trusted source of independent educational research and evaluation.